What is
a Better Fuel for Automobiles, Gasoline or Natural Gas?
Written
By:
Marlin
Plummer
November
16, 1999
Ever
since automobile emissions have been known to be a problem, manufacturers
have been trying to reduce them using pollution controlling devices. One
way to reduce emissions is by using a cleaner burning alterative fuel.
Natural gas is an affordable alternative fuel that can easily replace gasoline.
Natural gas does have disadvantages so, which is better, gasoline or natural
gas?
Natural
gas is 30-50 cents per gallon cheaper than gasoline. Also, natural gas
vehicles are just as efficient and sometimes more efficient than gasoline
powered vehicles. The only costs involve with natural gas vehicles is the
cost of conversion and the cost of purchasing a new vehicle. It costs about
four thousand dollars to convert an average automobile and a new natural
gas vehicle is about five thousand dollars more than a gasoline powered
vehicle. As for the environment natural gas vehicles emit much less emissions
than gasoline powered vehicles. They emit 65% less Carbon Monoxide, 30%
less Carbon Dioxide, 43% less Nitrogen Oxides, and 23% Less Unburned Hydrocarbons.
Also, When spilled gasoline easily makes its way into ground water but
natural gas is expelled into the air. The only true advantage of using
gasoline is the convenience of refilling your automobile. Natural gas refilling
stations are not very abundant but gas stations are everywhere. Gasoline
also has a negative affect on the economy. Most of the oil used to produce
gasoline is bought from other countries. This alone increases the national
trade deficit, which is bad for our economy.
Natural
gas is better than gasoline because it is an affordable way to produce
fewer emissions. The best way to get people to use natural gas is to educate
them about the benefits so they can make a choice as to what is better
for them.
Introduction
Automobile
emissions have been known to be a problem for over twenty years. Since
then manufacturers have been trying to reduce the exhaust emissions that
automobiles produce. They have succeeded in many ways by using exhaust
gas recirculation (EGR), catalytic converters, and electronic fuel injection.
Another way to reduce emissions is by using natural gas. Propane as it
is sometimes called, greatly reduces exhaust emissions and can be easily
used in today’s automobile engines. Even though natural gas works at reducing
emissions we still use gasoline in our cars today. There must be problems
with the use of natural gas or everyone would be using it. If natural gas
is
cleaner and can be used in internal combustion engines then which type
of fuel is a better choice, gasoline or natural gas?
To
answer this question, information was gathered by means of a few types
of research. Research included books written on the subject, articles on
the Internet, and an interview of Robert Johnson an automobile mechanic.
Robert has over ten years experience with electronic fuel injection systems
and has done maintenance on many natural gas vehicles. The questions in
the interview concerned the benefits and problems associated with the use
of natural gas and how they compare to the usage of gasoline.
The original purpose of using natural gas as an alternative fuel was to reduce emissions. While experimenting with this fuel other advantages were also found. These advantages give reason to believe that this type of fuel may be better than gasoline. Some of the advantages include, price is lower, allows engine to run more efficient, and exposes engine to less wear. This report will examine all differences in using both gasoline and natural gas to determine which fuel is better.
Cost
Comparison
Cost
is a big issue when deciding on such a large change. People resist spending
money on something they are unsure about even if they might save money
in the long run. To many people, gasoline is a necessity no matter what
the cost even if the cost is the environment. This section will show a
comparison between the costs of gasoline use and the change to natural
gas use.
Natural
gas is about 30 to 50 cents per gallon cheaper than gasoline (5). Natural
gas vehicles are just as efficient or more efficient than gasoline vehicles
so fuel consumption would be similar to gasoline powered vehicles (3).
This alone could save consumers hundreds of dollars every year.
The
price of a new car that runs on natural gas is about five thousand dollars
more than a car that runs on gasoline. It costs about four thousand dollars
to convert a car to run on natural gas (5). This would probably steer consumers
away from buying natural gas vehicles. For now the government is offering
incentives for the purchase of natural gas vehicles. From the federal government
a two thousand dollar tax deduction is available for the purchase of one
of these vehicles or for conversion of a vehicle to natural gas. There
are also incentives from state and local governments depending on where
you live (4). With savings related to the price of natural gas and the
incentive programs one can save enough money to pay for the price difference
for a new vehicle.
Another
cost comparison is the environment. Each year the government spends millions
of dollars of taxpayer’s money to try and find ways to reduce air pollution.
This includes research on natural gas vehicles. If people used natural
gas vehicles then in the long run the taxpayer will save money that would
otherwise be spent on pollution controlling research.
This section shows how the environment can be helped with little money from the public. In the future, if they become popular, natural gas vehicles will become more affordable to obtain. As this happens many people will be able to benefit from owning a natural gas vehicle. Not just the vehicle owners but also everyone that will breathe the cleaner air.
Convenience
Right
now convenience is the biggest reason why natural gas vehicles are not
being mass-produced. People like being able to purchase gasoline anywhere
and don’t want the hassle of finding a place to refill a natural gas powered
car.
A
downfall related to natural gas use is the inconvenience of not having
many places to refill your car. Gas stations are plentiful. It is
rare to be in a predicament were you cannot find a gas station when you
need to refill. There are a small number of places to get natural gas tanks
refilled but they are not at every other corner like gas stations. It is
very convenient to just pull into the next gas station to fill up with
fuel. With natural gas you will have to be careful not to run out of fuel
before you can reach the next refilling station. Refilling stations are
popping up all over the United States and if natural gas vehicles become
popular it will be easy to find a place to fill up.
On
the other hand natural gas vehicles can be convenient to own because natural
gas vehicles can be refilled at home. Since many people use natural gas
to heat their homes and to cook their food there will be access to a tank
at home that can be used to refuel their automobile. If safety is a concern,
there are certain measures that people can take to ensure a safe refill.
Another
convenience of using natural gas is the ability to convert any internal
combustion engine over to using natural gas as its fuel source. With most
cars having electronic fuel injection converting to natural gas can be
done very easily (3). There are many companies that do the conversions
and can do it to any vehicle. You can also convert your car to a bi-fuel
arrangement so it will run on both gasoline and natural gas. By doing this
you can share the conveniences of both fuels.
Most of the disadvantages of using natural gas have to do with the infrastructure. If natural gas vehicles become popular then the infrastructure will become more complete. This says that there will be more filling stations and it will be just as convenient to fill your natural gas vehicle, as it is to fill the car you drive today.
Economics
One way
that gasoline consumption affects our economy is the purchase of foreign
oil. Our country depends on foreign oil purchases to fulfill our demand
for gasoline. With more use of gasoline we increase the trade deficit,
which hurts the countries economy. We also have to defend the countries,
which sell us oil because we don’t want to lose them as a supplier. The
fighting in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia involved oil trade and cost our counties
millions of dollars (2).
Natural
gas use can also hurt our economy. Oil and gasoline companies employ many
people in the United States. If natural gas is used instead of gasoline
many people will lose their jobs. As long as gasoline is being sold these
people will keep their jobs keeping the unemployment ratings low.
Natural
gas affects the country in other ways as well. Gasoline can be easily produced
with different octane ratings. This is important because certain internal
combustion engines are designed to run on gasoline with certain octane
ratings (3). This gives the consumer a choice depending on which octane
is best for their vehicle. For an engine to perform its best using natural
gas it would have to be designed to run at the high octane that natural
gas has. Selling gasoline at different octane ratings helps the market
by giving consumers a choice.
There are trade offs between natural gas use and the use of gasoline. They both affect the economy in different ways. Gasoline’s influence is much greater, costing the country more money. Natural gas seems to be the best choice by saving the country money in the long run.
Environmental
Issues
The
environmental issues are the entire reason for examining the use of alternative
fuels. With more cars on the road today than in the past air pollution
is becoming a major problem.
The
air, especially in large cities is not very clean. Smog is a very big problem
that is caused by air pollution. With vehicles producing half of the air
pollution today it is noticeable that this is a very large disadvantage
of using gasoline.
Natural
gas burns much cleaner than gasoline. An internal combustion engine running
on natural gas on average emits 30% less Carbon Dioxide, 65% less Carbon
Monoxide, 43% less Nitrogen Oxides, and 23% less Unburned Hydrocarbons
than the same engine running on gasoline (See Figure 1). These are significant
reductions in emissions and will contribute to cleaner air and less global
warming (5).
Each
year automobiles dump tons of emissions into our atmosphere. The most critical
emissions are Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Monoxide, Unburned Hydrocarbons, and
Nitrogen Oxides.
Carbon
Dioxide will always be an emission because it is a product of the chemical
reaction of a hydrocarbon combusting. Gasoline and natural gas both contain
hydrocarbons. The combustion of natural gas results in 30% less carbon
dioxide than the combustion of gasoline. Carbon Dioxide is believed to
be the cause of global warming.
Carbon
Monoxide interferes with oxygen getting into the blood. This causes reduced
aerobic capacity, headaches, nausea, and in extreme cases death. Just by
using natural gas an internal combustion engine emits 65% less Carbon Monoxide.
Unburned
Hydrocarbons come from fuel and air that escape from the combustion process.
In other words the fuel is emitted out of the exhaust pipe unburned. This
emission is an irritant and is carcinogenic.
Nitrogen
Oxides come form the combination of nitrogen and oxygen in the air under
extreme pressure and temperature. Nitrogen Oxides can cause damage to the
lungs and in extreme cases can also cause death. Also, Nitrogen Oxides
and Unburned Hydrocarbons combine with sunlight to cause ground level ozone
usually referred to as smog. Smog is an increasing problem in large cities.
Using natural gas reduces Unburned Hydrocarbons by 23% and Nitrogen Oxides
by 43%.
Another
environmental consideration is the amount of oil and gasoline that is spilled
each year. Just look at the Exxon® oil spill a couple of years ago.
Each year people spill thousand of gallons of gasoline. Gasoline is a liquid
at room temperature and easily makes its way into our drinking water. Natural
gas is a gas at room temperature so in the case of a natural gas leak it
is expelled into the air and not onto the ground where it can contaminate
the water.
The
most important weakness of using gasoline is the fact that it produces
more emissions than natural gas. With the government setting high emission
standards it is important to have a clean burning engine. With the use
of emission controlling devices today’s vehicles are easily meeting the
standards but older automobiles may have trouble passing emission testing
while running on gasoline. The air that we breathe today is not very clean.
With so many vehicles on the roads everyday, people are subject to a large
amount of emission filled air.
Another
environmental concern is the lack of being able to replenish the oil supply.
Oil is a fossil fuel and takes thousands of years to form. One day there
will not be any oil to produce gasoline with so we will have to turn to
other fuels. Though natural gas is also a fossil fuel it is more plentiful
than gasoline at the present time. Also natural gas vehicles are usually
more efficient and use less fuel.
Since
natural gas is a cleaner burning fuel it imparts less wear on the engine
it is being used in (3). This reduction in wear leads to extended engine
life and less engine maintenance. This means that people will need to change
their oil less often, which makes disposal of the used motor oil easier.
Also engines that would normally run one hundred thousand miles without
a tune up may be able to run much longer before needing this done. With
less used oil and less junk automobile engines the environment can only
benefit.
These environmental issues are very important and need to be considered. Using natural gas definitely benefits the environment, which is the basic reason for an alterative fuel.
Conclusions
Gasoline has been used as a fuel source for automobiles for over twenty years.
People are going to be
reluctant to quit using gasoline in their vehicles. They will have to be
convinced that the use of an alternative fuel is better for them. Many
people don’t know that they have a choice. Natural gas shows to be very
beneficial not only to the environment but also to the consumers. If people
are educated about different alternative fuels then they will be able to
make a decision that they believe is right for them.
Gasoline
is not the best fuel for automobiles. It is costing us more money each
year. The price keeps going up and the supply is declining. Gasoline is
bad for the environment. Too much is spilled and the emissions caused by
its use is degrading. Gasoline may be convenient to obtain but this does
not justify its use.
Natural gas proves to be a good alternative to gasoline. It is much better for the environment buy emitting fewer emissions and cannot be spilled. It is affordable to use as compared to other alternative fuels and will be comparable to the costs of using gasoline in the near future. When it becomes popular it will be very easy to obtain because much of it can be found in the United States. Natural gas is definitely the better choice and should be used by everyone
Recommendations
Gasoline
obviously has some benefits but sacrifice should be made to create a cleaner
environment. The benefits of using gasoline do not involve the environment.
The environment is the reason for examining alternative fuel usage. It
should be our concern to clean up the environment by using a cleaner burning
fuel.
If more
people were interested in the use of natural gas and if there were a demand
for natural gas vehicles then the manufacturers would sell these cars at
a cost comparable to that of a gasoline powered automobile. People need
to be educated about the choices that they have. If people knew about the
benefits of using natural gas in their car then they might be willing to
give it a try.
Automobile
manufactures should advertise their natural gas vehicles. They need to
let people know that the vehicles are out there and some people drive them
every day. The natural gas companies should also advertise the use of their
fuel in automobiles. This would let people know that there are places to
obtain natural gas and using natural gas use is an accepted practice.
(1)
Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., Enhancing Natural Gas Vehicle
Technology
Warrendale,
PA, 1992
(2)
Ebinger, Charles K., Natural Gas Vehicles a National Security Perspective,
Center for
Strategic
and International Studies, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., 1984
(3)
Johnson, Robert, “Interview concerning the benefits of natural gas vehicles,”
Unpublished
survey, November 1999
(4)
Consolidated Natural Gas Co., Natural Gas Powered Vehicles Fact Sheet,
www.cng.com/corp/ngv/html/ngv.htm,
1999
(5)
San Diego Gas and Electric. Natural Gas Vehicles, www.sdge.com/Ngv/ng_1.html,
1999